The Importance of Judge Alito’s Martha-Ann Bomgardner Ruling

While most of the Supreme Court’s Martha rulings have gotten some media coverage, there was one decision this month that received very little attention – until now. It was the ruling of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito on the case of Martha-Ann Bomgardner vs. the United States, and it could have major implications for your rights in the future. But what does it all mean? That’s what we’re going to find out in this article.

What was the case about?

Martha-Ann had a young daughter and she wanted to breastfeed her exclusively for as long as possible. Her doctor agreed and wrote a medical note suggesting no formula unless medically necessary. The mom’s employer, however, told her that if she brought the note to them they would fire her.

Not willing to risk losing the ability to feed her daughter, Martha decided not to take the notes from her doctor but rather stop breastfeeding altogether and start using a pump so she could continue pumping milk for later when she was able to take breaks from work.

To add insult to injury, this mother found out months later that there was no rule preventing employees from bringing notes from their physicians about their decision not to use formula during work hours.

This case was about breast milk as well as breastfeeding rights, but it also had to do with breastfeeding restrictions and how employers deal with employees that want to continue breastfeeding while they’re at work. For example, if an employee brings a note from their doctor requesting not to use formula while they’re at work or on break, should an employer follow that note?

Should they accept the note or require more evidence before agreeing? If they decide not to allow their employee to continue breastfeeding, should they inform their doctor or tell them later when it is no longer possible? The outcome of such cases is important for mothers and society. First, it will protect mothers’ ability to breastfeed in many situations.

Why is this ruling important?

Judge Alito recently had to decide the case, Martha-Ann Bomgardner v. US Bank National Association. This specific dispute is unique because it was regarding a national bank who, unfortunately, misled their customer into opening an interest-only mortgage with both misleading and unclear contractual language.

The idea that took place is whether or not U.S. Bank National Association would be liable for damages as per the Truth In Lending Act in such a situation and if so, what the number of damages would be.

Martha Ann Bomgardner argued that U.S. Bank violated TILA by deceptive acts and practices when providing her with loans that she did not know about, but the contract stated otherwise: it is explained on page 8 (where Ms. Bomgardner made the signature)

For all purposes of this agreement and any other agreements between you and us, we are acting as your agent. She then signed at the bottom of page 9 where it says I hereby acknowledge that I have read this entire agreement. But later she found out that there were more pages at the back with terms regarding mortgages which she never knew about.

Martha-Ann Bomgardner argued that because she wasn’t informed properly before signing, she should not be held accountable for being deceived by U.S. Bank and therefore her loan should just get refinanced to take away the deception from going forward.

Does this ruling affect your family life in any way?

Martha-Ann was a spirited kindergartener. She loved to sing, play with animals and build things. She had an imagination like no other and would get so excited as she spoke to her mother, Isabeli Campos. It was always a joy to watch the two together, especially when Isabeli got Martha-Ann all excited about something that they were going to do together in the future:

travel someplace new or learn how to cook new foods. It will be just you and me! they would say while dancing around in circles, talking excitedly and giggling nonstop.

As Martha-Ann got older it became clear that she wasn’t a typical child by any means; if anything she was smarter than most adults.

One day, Isabeli had to travel away from home for a weekend and she left her beloved daughter with her in-laws. But her mother felt worried and couldn’t get Martha out of her mind. She knew that it wouldn’t be appropriate to ask to speak with her while she was gone but when she finally got back home on Sunday night, Isabeli wanted nothing more than to speak with her daughter right away. I

t has now been six months since Isabeli last saw Martha-Ann but all these thoughts were running through her head as soon as she returned home that night. She was anxious and excited all at once.

Keep browsing Law Scribd for more updates.