Why Elite Biglaw Brown Jackson’s LSAT Score is Wildly Irrelevant

Why Ketanji Brown Jackson's LSAT Score is Wildly Irrelevant

What if someone told you that Ketanji Brown Jackson’s LSAT score wasn’t as bad as you thought it was? And what if they were right? I’m not talking about the fact that

she scored a 161, which isn’t bad at all and is certainly capable of getting Ketanji into several top law schools

The legal industry used to require a specific degree for employment

Ketanji Brown Jackson took these strides when she became a judge in Washington D.C., Ketanji despite having only an undergraduate degree from Princeton. And if she can do it (and succeed), then so can you!

This generation of lawyers doesn’t need to spend years getting LSAT degrees that might not even help them, just to get into the workforce; they can get in with a much more flexible law school or online program.

For those who are looking for jobs outside of the legal industry, this isn’t as important- but employers will still want to see some indication that you’re ready for their particular profession LSAT, and this could be achieved by taking courses on specific areas within the field of interest.

Some professions require specific certifications which means spending more time and money than would be necessary for entry-level positions, but certifications are often helpful later on because they set one apart from LSAT others vying for similar positions.

No matter which direction you go, it’s important to have persistence and dedication to making sure that one day your dreams are realized.

The legal industry continues to require specific degrees for employment LSAT

The legal industry requires a variety of degrees, in the form of J.D., B.A., and LL.B., with several years to obtain them. This makes it difficult for those who wish LSAT to enter the legal field to get their foot in the door;

therefore, many move into other professions that offer more entry-level positions like social work, physical therapy, and nursing.

Ketanji Brown Jackson LSAT not having a law degree demonstrates that there are options for people who aren’t interested in pursuing a law degree in pursuit of their careers or educational goals.

Even though she made an impact on her community as an attorney she found herself wanting more than just social justice work could provide which led her down the path of public service later in life.

Anti-discrimination laws are (slowly) changing

Laws that prohibit discrimination against historically LSAT disadvantaged populations are generally evolving to encompass emerging, underserved populations. In a recent example,

the United States Supreme Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation in places of public accommodation.

However, there is one form of identity-based discrimination that the law has yet to embrace: unequal treatment based on standardized test scores. I write here about how racial disparities in standardized testing can affect employment opportunities and wage potential.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has noted that standardized test scores can play a role in employment decisions and may be used by employers to tip the scales against candidates belonging to certain racial groups,

such as African Americans and Hispanics. The EEOC has previously made clear that these practices are discriminatory, despite claims by some employers that they use race-neutral methods of screening out applicants with low SAT scores, such as writing an essay or answering questions in an interview.

The act of interpreting and scoring a standardized test may itself involve stereotyping about what a score means for someone who holds a particular identity. These biases can be coupled with unconscious bias on behalf of employers who come to rely on standardized tests as shorthand for merit or ability at work.

Diversity in law firms benefits everyone involved

There is a pervasive idea that white men from elite institutions are inherently better than those from others. These beliefs are often implicitly or explicitly manifested in law firms.

This can take the form of subtle disparagement, with comments such as you’re only here because of affirmative action. However, diversity in law firms benefits everyone involved.

Diversity leads to increased creativity and innovation, better problem-solving skills, and even higher scores on the bar exam. More diverse companies are demonstrably more productive than homogenous ones.

And finally, lawyers working for firms with diverse legal teams make more money than those who work for all-white or all-male organizations.

Keep browsing Law Scribd for more updates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *